I’ve been thinking of the concept of garbage in / garbage
out. It’s a computer science
concept. It’s an interesting
concept. The idea is that a computer is
capable of processing all sorts of data, not just good data. So if you give a computer bad data, it will
spit out bad results. Makes perfect
sense in the computer world. But what
about applying the concept to life?
Seems perfectly applicable to me, but it’s hard to interpret
what constitutes good or bad information.
The basic concept I’m trying is limit the type of music I intentionally
listen to. I find that it’s hard to
maintain the correct mindset when being assaulted by lyrics that preach the
wrong kind of information.
Building the concept of where I want to be in relation to
where I am is only limited by what my mind thinks I’m capable of. But when you feed your mind information
telling it that something can’t be done, then you are defeating yourself. Logically, your brain is sitting there
telling you that the music you are listening to is not affecting you. But it is, and the effect is incredibly
subtle. It’s something easy to test,
though it requires a bit of discipline.
What I did was eliminate music with words from my day to day
listening.
I guess I spent too much time listening to people doing bad
things to other people. Or listening to
music written by people who are convinced the world is out to get them. Or those that think the world owes them something. I’m generally more inclined to think the
world is ambivalent to individual existence.
Life is not fair, or easy. But
that doesn’t mean there is plenty of great stuff to pull out of the world. In the grand scheme of things, the individual
human life spans a very short period and has very little impact. So really, our lives don’t matter all that
much.
But mentally, people don’t want to believe that. They want to believe in the importance and
reach of their life. But it’s simply not
the case for the most part. So you get a
collection of garbage thrown in your brain that tells you the wrong thing and
leads you to the wrong conclusions. And
generally, these conclusions are very logical.
Andy Andrews describes it as “thinking logically to the wrong conclusion”.
So my recent approach has been to take in less garbage with
the hopes of getting better information out.
I recently took a 4 day weekend after 17 straight days at work. I had to work 17 straight days because I had
been focusing on solving the wrong problem.
See, there’s the right problem and the wrong problem. If you solve the wrong problem, you have to
keep solving the problem over and over again.
It just doesn’t work. What I
finally realized in those last three or four days was I could have easily
avoided working 17 days straight if I had done the correct thing. What I needed to do was document better. If I had documented better, then I could have
turned anyone calling me to look at the document in question and follow it to
its conclusions. If the document was
incapable of producing an answer, then there must have been some other issue.
What good does it do to create wonderful systems that have
no documentation or notes?
No comments:
Post a Comment