A while ago, I was thinking about content creation. And I was thinking that the ratio should probably be better than a 2:1 ratio of production versus consumption. It was just some number that randomly popped into my head. And the number sounded good, but that's... quite unrealistic.
A production of that level would mean for every 2 pages you write, you would read 1 page. Which sounds like a great idea, but I consume a page at about every 2-3 minutes. Production of a page can take upwards of an hour. So the time comparisons aren't really comparable.
And then you deal with esoteric subjects like measuring production of non-text info. What about drawings? Or 3D models? You don't really consume 3D models. You could consume drawings in the form of comics and cartoons. But how do you measure progress on those things? It's a good question.
So, rather than use absolute measures of production/consumption, I think the measure should be time spent. I'm still convinced you should maintain a 2:1 ratio, but it's two hours to one hour. Two hours of content production can produce different levels based on the media, but it still produces. It also causes long term progress towards goals.
One hour of consumption allows you to get a more absolute measure. Because really, it's all opportunity taxes. An hour spent consuming is quite literally an hour you will never get back. An hour spent producing is also, paradoxically, an hour you will never get back. But it makes you feel a lot better to spend an hour working on something that will lead you to accomplish your goals.
No comments:
Post a Comment